I just finished reading Tricked
, Alex Robinson's second graphic novel. I've already blogged
about his previous (and IMHO superior) effort, Box Office Poison
, because of its frequent, apparently intentional use of that runtogether-of-runtogethers, alot
Whether this spelling reflected Robinson's personal opinion on the matter or was merely character-correct, it was still a bold choice.
I looked through Tricked
twice (it's interesting how we no longer say scanned
here) for instances of either a lot
. I didn't find anything, but on his blog, Robinson uses a lot
Assuming that alot
did reflect some descriptivist leanings, has this erstwhile People's Hero undergone a prescriptivist conversion? There's a quirk in Tricked
that makes me suspect he has. Spoilers, ho!
Check out this deployment of obviously
This happens several times in the book. A character will say something that has both an obvious, correct interpretion and an unlikely, yet still grammatically correct interpretation, and then make a point of how they can see both interpretations and are smart enough to go with the obvious, correct one.
Here's another example, in parentheses at the bottom:
This only happens about three or four times in the novel, but it's enough to stand out. I know that it's probably meant to be amusing... but there are a lot of ways to be amusing and this was an odd choice. Why would anyone think like this?
These characters seem to be constantly on guard against improbable but grammatical misinterpretations — putting aside deeper readings here, it really makes me wonder if Robinson had a bad experience with an overzealous editor
. Something that might have left him with a copy editor's eye and this prophylactic tic.
Labels: geekery, grammar politics